Danger: Failing to assess the costs of failure

Joanne Flinn

Danger: Failing to assess the costs of failure

December 21, 2012

Projects are investments, yet are they assessed as such? A single project is either performing or not. It adds value to the portfolio or not. The failure to assess the costs of failure represents a major opportunity for business improvement.

Alex Boozier of [the UK’s] Oxford University, whose research was published Harvard Business Review last year, showed that one in six IT projects cost two to four times what is expected, and that nearly half of such projects are underfunded.

[T]hese facts show a downward spiral. One project underperforms, taking funds and energy from the next project. Performance declines.

A single failing project costs time, money, people and opportunity. If the project is big, it can wipe out the benefits of hundreds of smaller successful projects. It’s the maths of portfolio returns on investments.

As a financially inclined person, I calculated the project portfolio return using a yield formula using several benchmark project portfolios. The numbers shocked: 27.5% was written off.

I had a certified public accountant friend check. He said “Yes, that’s the data, that’s the result.” As a human and a business owner/executive, that's worrying.

Let’s keep it simple: these benchmarks are predictive: a $1,000,000 project is very likely to have a budget overrun of $275,000. This likely budget overrun (aka ‘incremental budget’) gets proportionally bigger as projects get bigger. This changes a business case. If a project does not have what it needs to deliver, it’s even more likely to fail.

It’s predictable, with 20 years of data.

My key points on business case, projects and investment:
• Business cases need to consider this risk profile; two to four times over budget is materially dangerous for big ticket projects in most businesses
• Success or failure is predictable upfront
• Early warning systems can identify what projects (and budget) are at risk, and what to do.

Looks like it’s time for a check-up of projects, upfront.

Joanne Flinn is a diagnostician of project failure and it’s cure, the author of “The Success Healthcheck for IT Projects” (Wiley 2010). Reach her at www.sheltonconsulting.com
 

 

Thumbail image from server side store: 
Joanne Flinn
Ovum analyst explains Korea’s shift to tariff-based competition
Time to rethink the fundamentals of network investment models
Ericsson is the top vendor, Huawei is the fastest growing
Heartbleed, MH370 saga challenge what we thought we knew about security capabilities
The network is not the product -- it's application delivery
Market needs reliable infrastructure, pro-innovation policies, effective competition to mature
Low-cost devices and an encrypted smartphone OS steal the show
A rundown of the new smartphone OS challengers vying to be the third platform
Ericsson has been in Asia for more than 100 years and will continue to drive technology and services leadership in order to bring the best mobile experiences to end users

 

Telecomasia.net full website

© 2012 Questex Asia Ltd., a Questex Media Group company. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited. Please send any technical comments or questions to our webmaster.