Ericsson gets into bed with Datang

Nicole McCormick
telecomasia.net
Ericsson is aiming to boost its China 3G offerings by hooking up with state-backed vendor Datang Telecom.
 
Ericssion announced Tuesday it will integrate Datang's TD-SCDMA radio access network equipment into its 3G portfolio. 
 
Under an MoU, it will also jointly develop TDD-LTE network solutions with Datang, which holds virtually all of the Chinese government’s TD-SCDMA patents.
 
The cooperation aims to promote a “common platform for FDD and TDD” in order to “increase the industrialization capabilities of TDD solutions by achieving economies of scale,” Ericsson said.
 
The Swedish vendor set up a TDD joint research center with Datang in Beijing in January 2008, but the latest strategic cooperation takes the relationship between the pair “to a substantially new level.”
 
The announcement follows analysts’ warnings that earnings at Ericsson – the world’s biggest wireless vendor – will be under pressure as Chinese operators trim their 3G rollouts. 
 
Ericsson has won only a small fraction of China Mobile’s TD-SCDMA rollout, which peaked last year. The bulk of the contracts have been won by ZTE, Huawei and Datang Mobile, Datang Telecom’s infrastructure subsidiary.
 
Ericsson signed a TD-SCDMA product alliance with ZTE five years ago, but the two companies have been marketing their solutions separately.
 
Datang, a small loss-making vendor spun off out of a government research institute, is at the center of China’s decade-long effort to commercialize TD-SCDMA.
 
Chen Shanzhi, Datang Telecom vice president and CTO, said the pact with Ericsson will help “drive the globalization of TD-SCDMA and play an important role in the industrialization of TD-LTE in the long run."

Commentary

The internet and the end of the world as we know it

Have telecoms providers simply become internet on-ramps? If so, why bother trying to be anything else?

Have telecoms providers simply become internet on-ramps? If so, why bother trying to be anything else?

Hugh Roberts

We talk of establishing the “total digital lifestyle” by 2040 - but what if consumers reject it?